<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HumCPR.org &#187; Events</title>
	<atom:link href="http://humcpr.org/section/events/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://humcpr.org</link>
	<description>Humboldt Coalition For Property Rights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 00:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Homes on TPZ Given Thumbs Up!</title>
		<link>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/homes-on-tpz-given-thumbs-up/</link>
		<comments>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/homes-on-tpz-given-thumbs-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2010 22:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[farm bureau]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Plan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[residences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humcpr.org/?p=779</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning Commission Votes in Favor of Homes on TPZ
In a stunning reversal of recent trends, the Humboldt County Planning Commission voted 4-1 in favor of language that would allow homes on land zoned TPZ at it&#8217;s GPU meeting in Eureka Thursday April 15th.
The vote came at the end of a night filled with public testimony [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="subtitle">Planning Commission Votes in Favor of Homes on TPZ</h3>
<p>In a stunning reversal of recent trends, the Humboldt County Planning Commission voted 4-1 in favor of language that would allow homes on land zoned TPZ at it&#8217;s GPU meeting in Eureka Thursday April 15th.</p>
<p>The vote came at the end of a night filled with public testimony in favor of rural rights and after much wrangling over other language in the Forest Section (4.6) of the Land Use Element.</p>
<p> In fact, the issue of residential construction on timberlands was deemed so controversial that commissioners first thought it would have to be put over to the next meeting since there were only 10 minutes left on the clock by the time they got to that policy.</p>
<p>But it appears <b>our voices were heard after all</b> and a quick straw poll resulted in the <b>4-1 vote</b>.</p>
<p>Specifically, the commissioners voted to adopt language provided by the <b>Humboldt County Resource Lands Working Group</b> which is comprised of The Buckeye Conservancy, the Humboldt County  Farm Bureau, Humboldt Del Norte Cattlemen Association, Large Timberland Owners Group and the Forest Landowners of California (Humboldt Co. Representatives).</p>
<p>The language is very similar to that provided by the <b>Forestry Review Committee</b> and we at <b>HumCPR</b> have been very vocal in our support.</p>
</p>
<p><b>The Policy As Approved:</b></p>
<p>&#8220;Residential Construction on TPZ Zoned Parcels: Recognize the right to construct a residence under a ministerial permitting process subject to physical standards set by the County. Second units; may be allowed on TPZ parcels greater than 160 acres; And, may be allowed on TPZ parcels less than 160 acres as a conditional use only in the area already converted, intended to be converted, or that does not meet the definition of timberlands. Second units may be allowed on TPZ parcels less than 40 acres within Community Planning Areas.&#8221;</p>
<p><b>[</b>To underline the significance of this vote it's worth taking a look at the policy proposed under Alternative A, which language had just been revised. It read as follows: "FR-P9. Residential Construction on TPZ Zoned Parcels: Preserve continued viability of timber production on TPZ zoned parcels by <i>requiring demonstration of active management for timber production prior to issuance on new residential permits</i> and by mitigating the impacts of residences on water resources, biological resources, wildland fire potential and public services. .  Residential uses <i>shall be limited to individuals employed on the premises for lands planned Industrial Timber (IT) or necessary for the management of timberlands on lands planned Timber Production (T)</i>".<b> ]</b></p>
<p>This is a clear victory for rural rights and it&#8217;s important to note that <b>we must continue to speak out!</b> There is still a lot to be discussed and clarified. And it will be the <b>Supervisors</b> who decide in the end!</p>
<p><i> A Big Thanks to all who showed up at the meetings so far! Let&#8217;s keep up the good work!</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/homes-on-tpz-given-thumbs-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TPZ Lands Discussion Continues April 15th</title>
		<link>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/tpz-lands-discussion-continues-april-15th/</link>
		<comments>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/tpz-lands-discussion-continues-april-15th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 00:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Plan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[planning dept]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timberland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use permits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humcpr.org/?p=767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Controversial Land Use Issue Discussion Continues!
The Humboldt County Planning Commission will return to its deliberations on rural lands policies on Thursday April 15th
According to Planning Department staff the Commission intends to continue discussion of section 4.6 of the land Use Element. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM at the Supervisors&#8217; Chambers in Eureka.
 Public Comment [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="subtitle">Controversial Land Use Issue Discussion Continues!</h3>
<p>The Humboldt County Planning Commission will return to its deliberations on rural lands policies on Thursday April 15th</p>
<p>According to Planning Department staff the Commission intends to continue discussion of section 4.6 of the land Use Element. The meeting begins at 6:00 PM at the Supervisors&#8217; Chambers in Eureka.</p>
<p><b> Public Comment Will be Accepted at this Meeting.</b></p>
<p><i>It is very important to attend this and subsequent meetings if you can. There are several very controversial aspects to this section<b> especially relating to your right to build a home on your land if it is zoned for timber. </b>The proposed <b>mandatory merging</b> of contiguous parcels in single ownership is also a key issue.  This is when resource land owners will learn the Commissioners’ responses (if any) to their issues and concerns. Decisions made at this level will have major impacts on your stewardship rights.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humcpr.org/2010/04/tpz-lands-discussion-continues-april-15th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Forestry Review Committee to Speak at Hearing</title>
		<link>http://humcpr.org/2010/03/forestry-review-committee-to-speak-at-hearing/</link>
		<comments>http://humcpr.org/2010/03/forestry-review-committee-to-speak-at-hearing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 22:05:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Plan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kirk Girard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timberland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPZ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humcpr.org/?p=735</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE: MEETING RESCHEDULED TO MARCH 11TH
After much discussion as to whether or not their input was warranted, the Forestry Review Committee will finally have a chance to present their GPU recommendations to the Planning Commission on Thursday, MARCH 11TH (The meeting was originally scheduled for February 25th).
The FRC is a standing subcommittee appointed by and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="subtitle">UPDATE: MEETING RESCHEDULED TO <b>MARCH 11TH</b></h3>
<p>After much discussion as to whether or not their input was warranted, the Forestry Review Committee will finally have a chance to present their GPU recommendations to the Planning Commission on Thursday, MARCH 11TH (The meeting was originally scheduled for February 25th).</p>
<p>The FRC is a standing subcommittee appointed by and serving at the pleasure of the Board of Supervisors.  They act in an advisory capacity to both the Humboldt County Board of Supervisors and to the Planning Commission, and consider technical forest related matters of concern to Humboldt County. The subcommittee informs and makes recommendations on these matters to both the Supervisors and the Planning Commission.</p>
<p>This presentation has been on hold for some time as the commission discussed Planning Director Kirk Girard&#8217;s position that the FRC charter adopted by the Supervisors, does not authorize the FRC to make policy-related recommendations.</p>
<p> The upshot of the discussion is that a representative of the FRC will present their recommendations on the 11th</p>
<p>The FRC has not commented on the plan recently but in 2008 they presented their recommendations to the <a href="http://co.humboldt.ca.us/board/agenda/questys/MG115157/AS115204/AS115205/AI133478/DO138668/BOSAgendaItem.pdf">Board of Supervisors.</a> </p>
<p> <b>This will be a very important meeting for those interested in TPZ- related issues, such as <i>BUILDING A HOME ON LAND ZONED FOR TIMBER.</i></b></p>
<p> According to staff, &#8220;The Commission intends to continue the ongoing discussion of the draft Land Use Element, Sections 4.5 Agricultural Resources (and possibly Section 4.6, Forest Resources) from 6:00pm to 7:00pm and then accept a presentation from the chair of the Forestry Review Committee of the Committee’s recommendations on the Forest Resources policies&#8221;.<br />
The <b>Assessor</b> has also been added to the agenda: Again, according to staff, &#8220;The Assessor will follow with a presentation on revenue and valuations concerning the Timber Yield Tax and the Timber Production Zone&#8221;. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humcpr.org/2010/03/forestry-review-committee-to-speak-at-hearing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Use Discussion Continues Feb 18th</title>
		<link>http://humcpr.org/2010/02/land-use-discussion-continues-feb-18th/</link>
		<comments>http://humcpr.org/2010/02/land-use-discussion-continues-feb-18th/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 02:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General Plan Update]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Homes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Lands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[timberland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TPZ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[use permits]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humcpr.org/?p=731</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forestland Discussion May Begin
The Humboldt County Planning Commission will return to its deliberations on rural lands policies on Thursday February 18th
According to Planning Department staff &#8220;the Commission intends to continue the ongoing discussion of the draft Land Use Element, Sections 4.5 Agricultural Resources (and possibly Section 4.6, Forest Resources) from 6:00pm to 8:30pm&#8221; at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="subtitle">Forestland Discussion May Begin</h3>
<p>The Humboldt County Planning Commission will return to its deliberations on rural lands policies on Thursday February 18th</p>
<p>According to Planning Department staff &#8220;the Commission intends to continue the ongoing discussion of the draft Land Use Element, Sections 4.5 Agricultural Resources (and possibly Section 4.6, Forest Resources) from 6:00pm to 8:30pm&#8221; at the Supervisors&#8217; Chambers in Eureka.</p>
<p><b> Public Comment May be Accepted at this Meeting.</b></p>
<p><i>It is very important to attend these meetings if you can. This is when resource land owners will learn the Commissioners’ responses (if any) to their issues and concerns. Decisions made at this level will have major impacts on your stewardship rights.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humcpr.org/2010/02/land-use-discussion-continues-feb-18th/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Land Use Element Meeting Cancelled</title>
		<link>http://humcpr.org/2010/01/land-use-element-meeting-cancelled/</link>
		<comments>http://humcpr.org/2010/01/land-use-element-meeting-cancelled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 22:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[forest resources]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FRC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[land use element]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[meetings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rural Lands]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://humcpr.org/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Planning Commission Meeting
Land Use Element of the GPU
6:00 PM January 21st, 2010  CANCELLED

Board of Supervisors Chambers, Eureka
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h3 class="subtitle">Planning Commission Meeting</h3>
<h3 class="subtitle">Land Use Element of the GPU</h3>
<h4>6:00 PM January 21st, 2010 <b> CANCELLED</b>
<p>
Board of Supervisors Chambers, Eureka</h4>
<p><According to Planning Department senior staff, The January 21, 2010 Planning Commission meeting on the General Plan Update has been cancelled.</p>
<p> The Planning Commission will continue deliberations on Section 4.5, the Agricultural Lands section of the Land Use Element to <b>February 18th</b></p>
<p>Also, at it&#8217;s Jan 14th meeting the Commission had discussed scheduling a presentation from the <b>Forestry Review Committee</b> on the 21st.</p>
<p>According to senior planner Martha Spencer &#8220;It is anticipated that the Forestry Review Committee will be available to present their recommendations&#8221; during the February 18th meeting instead.</p>
<p> <b>Public Comment <em>will be Accepted</em> at this Meeting.</b></p>
<p><em>It is very important to attend these meetings if you can. This is when resource land owners will learn the Commissioners&#8217; responses (if any) to their issues and concerns. Decisions made at this level will have major impacts on your stewardship rights. There is no clear indication of when we will be able to address them again</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://humcpr.org/2010/01/land-use-element-meeting-cancelled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
